Still on Catholic Defender 2000

Nininerbiyos na si Catholic Defender 2000

Since I announced that in January,2013, I will published the first part of my series of articles titled “The Church in History” and the second part of my series of articles titled “Answering Catholic Defenders” he is posting many articles against the Iglesia ni Cristo. The latest he posted is titled, “Ano ang naiambag ng Iglesia ni Cristo sa Lipunan at sa Mundo.”

Studying his articles he recently posted, we can see that my first article about “Ancwering Catholic Defenders” titled “The Ways of the Catholic Defenders in Decieving the people: Public Beware” has a very strong impact on him and his credibility.

The question is: Mr. Catholic Faith Defender, if you are not truly decieving people as what my article discussed, why not answer it? refute it?

Instead of answering my article proving that the Catholic Defenders using dirty tactics and tricks in order to decieved the people and made them believe that the Iglesia ni Cristo is evil and not the true Church, he posted articles full of baseless accusations, lies and personal attacks:

January 1, 2013

“KINAKASANGKAPAN nila ang Iglesia Katolika at PINAPASAMA lalo upang sila ang lilitaw na mabango, mabait at mga banal.”

Sino naman ang mga nakikinig sa kanilang mga BAYARANG MINISTRO?

 Piling-pili!  Mga IGNORANTE sa pananampalataya o ang mga NANLALAMIG at walang pakialam at naturingang Katoliko. 

December 28, 2012

“Let it be known that members of the INC of Manalo cult were seriously "brain-washed" by their equally misinformed paid ministers so they will never know the TRUTH which has been preached for more than 2 millennia now..”

December 26, 2912

Was it coincidental that I did not receive any comment from members of the Iglesia ni Cristo (1914) during the Christmas Day?

The reason why I am smiling about it is because I normally receive (nasty) comments (plural) from members of Manalo's cult on a daily basis. But yesterday till today I received none.

I can only assume that these Iglesia ni Cristo were not in their computers: THEY WERE BUSY CELEBRATING CHRISTMAS too.

Indeed, have a BLESSED CHRISTMAS to all the Iglesia ni Cristo (1914) members. Hopefully you enjoyed our CHRISTMAS. We know that you don't celebrate Christmas doctrinally but PRACTICALLY you do.

So, regarding what my article titled “The Ways of Catholic Defender in Decieving the People: Public Beware” discussed how these people “avoid the issue,” “misinform the people,” “makingup stories,” “inventing statements and accusing other that they said inorder to make people believe that their opponents teaching errors,” and “making lies,” Mr. Catholic Defender is truly silent.

Mr. Catholic Defender 2000, isn’t SILENCE MEANS YES or admitting guilt?

Instead of answering the issue he avoided it and posted articles that further proves that Catholic Faith Defenders using all the dirty tricks in the books to decieved the people.

My first article did not only exposed their dirty tactics and tricks in decieving the people, but also put him in a awkward situation, in a big shame, PAHIYANG-PAHIYA SIYA:

(1)   Was he not put into shame whe we exposed that he lied in saying that “Kata Holos” is what is written in Romans 1:7-8 to prove that the name “Catholic” is in the Bible (because the truth is, it’s not “kata holos” but “Holo to Kosmo”)?

(2)   Was he not put into big shame whe we exposed that he lied in saying that it’s the Catholic Church named the Bible rom Greek (because the first time the sacred books were called “Ta Biblia” was in Daniel 9:2 of the Septuagint, the Greek Bible made in 3^rd-2^nd century BC, long before Ignatius invented the name “Catholic” in 110 AD)?

(3)   Was he not put into big shame when we exposed that he is onlu deceiving the people in saying that brother Teofilo C. Ramos said that the Catholic Church was fabricated by bisops only in 1870 written in PASUGO, March 1956 issue, page 25 (because when we showed the actual PASUGO, Mrach 1956, p, 25 it was not there”?

Alam nila na marami pa (maraming-marami pa) kaming ihahayag na  KATOTOHANAN na MAGLALAGAY SA KANILA SA MALAKING KAHIHIYAN.

Mr. Catholic Defender 2000 felt the impact of my first article, and he knows that the second article of “Answering catholic Defender” and the first article of “The Church in History” will have the same impact, nininerbiyos na siya sa nalalapit na paglabas ng dalawa pang artikulo na alam niyang maghahayag pa rin ng katotohanan at lalo pang magpapahiya sa kaniya.  

He is indeed in a desperate move.